Bone, Not Adrenaline, Drives Fight or Flight Response



Bone, Not Adrenaline, Drives Fight or Flight Response


When faced with a predator or sudden danger, the heart rate goes up, breathing becomes more rapid, and fuel in the form of glucose is pumped throughout the body to prepare an animal to fight or flee.

These physiological changes, which constitute the “fight or flight” response, are thought to be triggered in part by the hormone adrenaline. 

But a new study from Columbia researchers suggests that bony vertebrates can’t muster this response to danger without the skeleton. The researchers found in mice and humans that almost immediately after the brain recognizes danger, it instructs the skeleton to flood the bloodstream with the bone-derived hormone osteocalcin, which is needed to turn on the fight or flight response.

“In bony vertebrates, the acute stress response is not possible without osteocalcin,” says the study’s senior investigator Gérard Karsenty, MD, PhD, chair of the Department of Genetics and Development at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons. 

“It completely changes how we think about how acute stress responses occur.”


Why Bone?


“The view of bones as merely an assembly of calcified tubes is deeply entrenched in our biomedical culture,”Karsenty says. But about a decade ago, his lab hypothesized and demonstrated that the skeleton has hidden influences on other organs. 

The research revealed that the skeleton releases osteocalcin, which travels through the bloodstream to affect the functions of the biology of the pancreas, the brain, muscles, and other organs.

A series of studies since then have shown that osteocalcin helps regulate metabolism by increasing the ability of cells to take inglucose, improves memory, and helps animals run faster with greater endurance.

Why does bone have all these seemingly unrelated effects on other organs? 

“If you think of bone as something that evolved to protect the organism from danger -- the skull protects the brain from trauma, the skeleton allows vertebrates to escape predators, and even the bones in the ear alert us to approaching danger -- the hormonal functions of osteocalcin begin to make sense,” Karsenty says. If bone evolved as a means to escape danger, Karsenty hypothesized that the skeleton should also be involved in the acute stress response, which is activated in the presence of danger.


Osteocalcin Necessary to React to Danger


If osteocalcin helps bring about the acute stress response, it must work fast, in the first few minutes after danger is detected. 

In the new study, the researchers presented mice with predator urine and other stressors and looked for changes in the bloodstream. Within 2 to 3 minutes, they saw osteocalcin levels spike. 

Similarly in people, the researchers found that osteocalcin also surges in people when they are subjected to the stress of public speaking or cross-examination. 

When osteocalcin levels increased, heart rate, body temperature, and blood glucose levels in the mice also rose as the fight or flight response kicked in.  

In contrast, mice that had been genetically engineered so that they were unable to make osteocalcin or its receptor were totally indifferent to the stressor. “Without osteocalcin, they didn’t react strongly to the perceived danger,” Karsenty says. “In the wild, they’d have a short day.” 

As a final test, the researchers were able to bring on an acute stress response in unstressed mice simply by injecting large amounts of osteocalcin.


Adrenaline Not Necessary for Fight or Flight


The findings may also explain why animals without adrenal glands and adrenal-insufficient patients -- with no means of producing adrenaline or other adrenal hormones -- can develop an acute stress response. 

Among mice, this capability disappeared when the mice were unable to produce large amounts of osteocalcin.

“This shows us that circulating levels of osteocalcin are enough to drive the acute stress response,” says Karsenty.


Physiology the New Frontier of Biology


Physiology may sound like old-fashioned biology, but new genetic techniques developed in the last 15 years have established it as a new frontier in science.

The ability to inactivate single genes in specific cells inside an animal, and at specific times, has led to the identification of many new inter-organ relationships. The skeleton is just one example; the heart and muscles are also exerting influence over other organs.

“I have no doubt that there are many more new inter-organ signals to be discovered,” Karsenty says, “and these interactions may be as important as the ones discovered in the early part of the 20th century.”


About the Paper


Dr. Karsenty also is Paul A. Marks Professor of Genetics and Development and professor of medicine at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons. 

The study, “Mediation of the acute stress response by the skeleton,” was published Sept. 12 in Cell Metabolism.

Other authors: Julian Meyer Berger (Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NY), Parminder Singh (National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India), Lori Khrimian (CUIMC), Donald A. Morgan (University of Iowa and Veteran Health Care System, IA), Subrata Chowdhury (CUIMC), Emilio Arteaga-Solis (CUIMC), Tamas L. Horvath (Yale University School of Medicine, CT), Ana I. Domingos (University of Oxford, UK), Anna L. Marsland (University of Pittsburgh, PA), Vijay Kumal Yadav (CUIMC and National Institute of Immunology), Kamal Rahmouni (University of Iowa and Veteran Health Care System), and Xiao-Bing Gao (Yale).

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants 2P01AG032959-06A1,1R01DK104727-03,1R01AR073180-01A1,DA040782-01A1, 5T32DK007328, 5T32DK007328-38, and 2P01HL084207); a Ramalingaswamy Fellowship; a CIHR Fellowship, the Veterans Administration (BX004249); and the Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center at the University of Iowa. 

The authors declare no competing financial interests.


In 1654, Rembrandt painted a picture of his mistress entitled “Bathsheba at her bath”. Over 300 years later, an Italian physician viewed the painting and noticed several characteristics of the left breast indicative of breast cancer. This title underlies James S. Olson’s book: Bathsheba’s breast: women, cancer & history, in which he examines breast cancer throughout history.

In 2019, an estimated 268,000 cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in women. But each year about 1 percent of all breast cancer cases will appear in men too — which works out to around 2,000 new cases. Male breast cancer is now more common than it was 25 years ago but a solemn fact remains: Experts simply don’t know the best way to treat breast cancer in men.

William G. Kaelin, MD, of Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, Gregg L. Semenza, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, and Sir Peter J. Ratcliffe, FMedSci, of Oxford University in the United Kingdom have been awarded the 2019 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their discoveries on how cells sense oxygen and adapt to it.

In its second edition, the International Journal of Disease Reversal and Prevention has published a breadth of new evidence suggesting among other things, that whole food plant-based nutrition may positively impact pulmonary hypertension, reverse type 2 diabetes, reverse blindness related to diabetic retinopathy and even improve sexual function in women.

The COMPLEMENTARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (The CMA) © 2012. No part of this site may be reproduced without the express permission of The Complementary Medical Association. If used without prior consent a charge of US $1,000 per article, or mini section is paid (US $50 per word (minimum) will be charged. This is not meant to reflect a commercial rate for the content, but as a punitive cost and to reimburse The CMA for legal fees and time costs). Use of the contents, without permission will be taken as consent to bill the illegal user in full.